Glaring Facts about
F-garments
While worrying about moral policing, why don’t they consider some glaring facts about feminine dressing. Socially and biologically, women require more safety and security than men.
A feminine body is more vulnerable to violence. It’s more susceptible to danger and harm. It should be carefully protected from sun, dirt, strangers’ stare and glare. But ironically her body is more exposed to those harmful things than that of her opposite sex. More open to evil things. Why? No biological reasons at all. She does it deliberately! Is it because of her convenience and comfort? Not either. Because of simplicity, modesty, humility? Neither of these factors!
Who’s responsible to this contradiction?
Who designed the female dress code and style?
She is, as if ordered (?) to wear light, transparent,
tight wears whereas men can wear stiff, opaque, loose-fitting outfits! Tight-fit, transparent clothes, blouse, pants and other feminine garments definitely enhance sex appeal and to attract the opposite sex.
Isn’t the weaker sex deliberately creating an environment inviting sexual motivation and violence with their provocative appearance?
Who decided that the man should be decently dressed covering almost all the body except the face and the woman should be with some very nice transparent, tight-fit attires?
Feminists, never turn a blind eye on these glaring facts about F-dress.
-pts
Glaring Facts about
ReplyDeleteF-garments